diff options
author | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2022-03-11 12:00:42 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> | 2022-04-16 13:57:23 -0700 |
commit | 2e53b877dc1258d4ac3de98f496bb88ec3bf5e25 (patch) | |
tree | 7ea3bac63c7f3f686da2eba687ea8a8ac142773e /drivers/misc/lkdtm | |
parent | 73f62e60d80c2d74491933ca49006b9e70563738 (diff) |
lkdtm: Add CFI_BACKWARD to test ROP mitigations
In order to test various backward-edge control flow integrity methods,
add a test that manipulates the return address on the stack. Currently
only arm64 Pointer Authentication and Shadow Call Stack is supported.
$ echo CFI_BACKWARD | cat >/sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash/DIRECT
Under SCS, successful test of the mitigation is reported as:
lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD
lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address.
lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: control flow unchanged.
Under PAC, successful test of the mitigation is reported by the PAC
exception handler:
lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD
lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address.
lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bfffffc0088d0514
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x86000004
EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
[bfffffc0088d0514] address between user and kernel address ranges
...
If the CONFIGs are missing (or the mitigation isn't working), failure
is reported as:
lkdtm: Performing direct entry CFI_BACKWARD
lkdtm: Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: ok: redirected stack return address.
lkdtm: Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...
lkdtm: FAIL: stack return address was redirected!
lkdtm: This is probably expected, since this kernel was built *without* CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL=y nor CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK=y
Co-developed-by: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Li <ashimida@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220416001103.1524653-1-keescook@chromium.org
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/misc/lkdtm')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c | 134 |
1 files changed, 134 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c index e88f778be0d5..804965a480b7 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/cfi.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ * This is for all the tests relating directly to Control Flow Integrity. */ #include "lkdtm.h" +#include <asm/page.h> static int called_count; @@ -42,8 +43,141 @@ static void lkdtm_CFI_FORWARD_PROTO(void) pr_expected_config(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG); } +/* + * This can stay local to LKDTM, as there should not be a production reason + * to disable PAC && SCS. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL +# ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL +# define __no_pac "branch-protection=bti" +# else +# define __no_pac "branch-protection=none" +# endif +# define __no_ret_protection __noscs __attribute__((__target__(__no_pac))) +#else +# define __no_ret_protection __noscs +#endif + +#define no_pac_addr(addr) \ + ((__force __typeof__(addr))((__force u64)(addr) | PAGE_OFFSET)) + +/* The ultimate ROP gadget. */ +static noinline __no_ret_protection +void set_return_addr_unchecked(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr) +{ + /* Use of volatile is to make sure final write isn't seen as a dead store. */ + unsigned long * volatile *ret_addr = (unsigned long **)__builtin_frame_address(0) + 1; + + /* Make sure we've found the right place on the stack before writing it. */ + if (no_pac_addr(*ret_addr) == expected) + *ret_addr = (addr); + else + /* Check architecture, stack layout, or compiler behavior... */ + pr_warn("Eek: return address mismatch! %px != %px\n", + *ret_addr, addr); +} + +static noinline +void set_return_addr(unsigned long *expected, unsigned long *addr) +{ + /* Use of volatile is to make sure final write isn't seen as a dead store. */ + unsigned long * volatile *ret_addr = (unsigned long **)__builtin_frame_address(0) + 1; + + /* Make sure we've found the right place on the stack before writing it. */ + if (no_pac_addr(*ret_addr) == expected) + *ret_addr = (addr); + else + /* Check architecture, stack layout, or compiler behavior... */ + pr_warn("Eek: return address mismatch! %px != %px\n", + *ret_addr, addr); +} + +static volatile int force_check; + +static void lkdtm_CFI_BACKWARD(void) +{ + /* Use calculated gotos to keep labels addressable. */ + void *labels[] = {0, &&normal, &&redirected, &&check_normal, &&check_redirected}; + + pr_info("Attempting unchecked stack return address redirection ...\n"); + + /* Always false */ + if (force_check) { + /* + * Prepare to call with NULLs to avoid parameters being treated as + * constants in -02. + */ + set_return_addr_unchecked(NULL, NULL); + set_return_addr(NULL, NULL); + if (force_check) + goto *labels[1]; + if (force_check) + goto *labels[2]; + if (force_check) + goto *labels[3]; + if (force_check) + goto *labels[4]; + return; + } + + /* + * Use fallthrough switch case to keep basic block ordering between + * set_return_addr*() and the label after it. + */ + switch (force_check) { + case 0: + set_return_addr_unchecked(&&normal, &&redirected); + fallthrough; + case 1: +normal: + /* Always true */ + if (!force_check) { + pr_err("FAIL: stack return address manipulation failed!\n"); + /* If we can't redirect "normally", we can't test mitigations. */ + return; + } + break; + default: +redirected: + pr_info("ok: redirected stack return address.\n"); + break; + } + + pr_info("Attempting checked stack return address redirection ...\n"); + + switch (force_check) { + case 0: + set_return_addr(&&check_normal, &&check_redirected); + fallthrough; + case 1: +check_normal: + /* Always true */ + if (!force_check) { + pr_info("ok: control flow unchanged.\n"); + return; + } + +check_redirected: + pr_err("FAIL: stack return address was redirected!\n"); + break; + } + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL)) { + pr_expected_config(CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL); + return; + } + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK)) { + pr_expected_config(CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK); + return; + } + pr_warn("This is probably expected, since this %s was built *without* %s=y nor %s=y\n", + lkdtm_kernel_info, + "CONFIG_ARM64_PTR_AUTH_KERNEL", "CONFIG_SHADOW_CALL_STACK"); +} + static struct crashtype crashtypes[] = { CRASHTYPE(CFI_FORWARD_PROTO), + CRASHTYPE(CFI_BACKWARD), }; struct crashtype_category cfi_crashtypes = { |