summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/pwm/core.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSean Young <sean@mess.org>2023-12-19 16:30:24 +0000
committerThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>2023-12-20 16:07:04 +0100
commitc748a6d77c06a78651030e17da6beb278a1c9470 (patch)
treee858d2200f87189a80b0aeeeb68d96a449b63a11 /drivers/pwm/core.c
parent80943bbdcfa8138eca3bfd71a8ed4bdf1e107f6b (diff)
pwm: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()
In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context, we will need two functions for applying pwm changes: int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *); This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function. Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> # for input Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/pwm/core.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/pwm/core.c18
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index b0e50ca9398a..c6228843a1a7 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -326,8 +326,8 @@ struct pwm_device *pwm_request_from_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_request_from_chip);
-static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
- const struct pwm_state *state)
+static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ const struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct pwm_state *last = &pwm->last;
struct pwm_chip *chip = pwm->chip;
@@ -433,11 +433,11 @@ static void pwm_apply_state_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
}
/**
- * pwm_apply_state() - atomically apply a new state to a PWM device
+ * pwm_apply_might_sleep() - atomically apply a new state to a PWM device
* @pwm: PWM device
* @state: new state to apply
*/
-int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
+int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
{
struct pwm_chip *chip;
int err;
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
/*
* Some lowlevel driver's implementations of .apply() make use of
* mutexes, also with some drivers only returning when the new
- * configuration is active calling pwm_apply_state() from atomic context
+ * configuration is active calling pwm_apply_might_sleep() from atomic context
* is a bad idea. So make it explicit that calling this function might
* sleep.
*/
@@ -475,11 +475,11 @@ int pwm_apply_state(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
* only do this after pwm->state was applied as some
* implementations of .get_state depend on this
*/
- pwm_apply_state_debug(pwm, state);
+ pwm_apply_debug(pwm, state);
return 0;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_apply_state);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_apply_might_sleep);
/**
* pwm_capture() - capture and report a PWM signal
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
state.period = pargs.period;
state.polarity = pargs.polarity;
- return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+ return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state);
}
/*
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
state.duty_cycle = state.period - state.duty_cycle;
}
- return pwm_apply_state(pwm, &state);
+ return pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_adjust_config);