diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:49:52 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:55:57 +0100 |
| commit | 2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368 (patch) | |
| tree | c158510b5e7942b3a0d6eb6807cbeacf96035798 /fs/btrfs/inode.c | |
| parent | 428080c9b19bfda37c478cd626dbd3851db1aff9 (diff) | |
| parent | 855684c7d938c2442f07eabc154e7532b4c1fbf9 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict
There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:
38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better
than the original commit:
1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code
... which was also done by an internal merge resolution:
2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree
But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient
within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block.
So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's
tree and follow his conflict resolution.
Conflicts:
arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/inode.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/btrfs/inode.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index f88e0ca8331d..4795738d5785 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -7835,6 +7835,7 @@ struct iomap_dio *btrfs_dio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, static int btrfs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, u64 start, u64 len) { + struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode = BTRFS_I(inode); int ret; ret = fiemap_prep(inode, fieinfo, start, &len, 0); @@ -7860,7 +7861,26 @@ static int btrfs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, return ret; } - return extent_fiemap(BTRFS_I(inode), fieinfo, start, len); + btrfs_inode_lock(btrfs_inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED); + + /* + * We did an initial flush to avoid holding the inode's lock while + * triggering writeback and waiting for the completion of IO and ordered + * extents. Now after we locked the inode we do it again, because it's + * possible a new write may have happened in between those two steps. + */ + if (fieinfo->fi_flags & FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC) { + ret = btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, 0, LLONG_MAX); + if (ret) { + btrfs_inode_unlock(btrfs_inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED); + return ret; + } + } + + ret = extent_fiemap(btrfs_inode, fieinfo, start, len); + btrfs_inode_unlock(btrfs_inode, BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED); + + return ret; } static int btrfs_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, |