diff options
author | Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> | 2024-01-22 14:31:03 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> | 2024-02-25 22:09:27 +0100 |
commit | 556c19f563b64dd5463b0030d19c8681f4f7446e (patch) | |
tree | d9d9dc826df3b5bdcd00ecdee3123f9ac5d9685d /fs/ubifs/ubifs.h | |
parent | 6379b44cdcd67f5f5d986b73953e99700591edfa (diff) |
ubifs: Queue up space reservation tasks if retrying many times
Recently we catched ENOSPC returned by make_reservation() while doing
fsstress on UBIFS, we got following information when it occurred (See
details in Link):
UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 3640152): make_reservation [ubifs]: cannot
reserve 112 bytes in jhead 2, error -28
CPU: 2 PID: 3640152 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G B W
Hardware name: Hisilicon PhosphorHi1230 EMU (DT)
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-ubifs_0_0)
Call trace:
dump_stack+0x114/0x198
make_reservation+0x564/0x610 [ubifs]
ubifs_jnl_write_data+0x328/0x48c [ubifs]
do_writepage+0x2a8/0x3e4 [ubifs]
ubifs_writepage+0x16c/0x374 [ubifs]
generic_writepages+0xb4/0x114
do_writepages+0xcc/0x11c
writeback_sb_inodes+0x2d0/0x564
wb_writeback+0x20c/0x2b4
wb_workfn+0x404/0x510
process_one_work+0x304/0x4ac
worker_thread+0x31c/0x4e4
kthread+0x23c/0x290
Budgeting info: data budget sum 17576, total budget sum 17768
budg_data_growth 4144, budg_dd_growth 13432, budg_idx_growth 192
min_idx_lebs 13, old_idx_sz 988640, uncommitted_idx 0
page_budget 4144, inode_budget 160, dent_budget 312
nospace 0, nospace_rp 0
dark_wm 8192, dead_wm 4096, max_idx_node_sz 192
freeable_cnt 0, calc_idx_sz 988640, idx_gc_cnt 0
dirty_pg_cnt 4, dirty_zn_cnt 0, clean_zn_cnt 4811
gc_lnum 21, ihead_lnum 14
jhead 0 (GC) LEB 16
jhead 1 (base) LEB 34
jhead 2 (data) LEB 23
bud LEB 16
bud LEB 23
bud LEB 34
old bud LEB 33
old bud LEB 31
old bud LEB 15
commit state 4
Budgeting predictions:
available: 33832, outstanding 17576, free 15356
(pid 3640152) start dumping LEB properties
(pid 3640152) Lprops statistics: empty_lebs 3, idx_lebs 11
taken_empty_lebs 1, total_free 1253376, total_dirty 2445736
total_used 3438712, total_dark 65536, total_dead 17248
LEB 15 free 0 dirty 248000 used 5952 (taken)
LEB 16 free 110592 dirty 896 used 142464 (taken, jhead 0 (GC))
LEB 21 free 253952 dirty 0 used 0 (taken, GC LEB)
LEB 23 free 0 dirty 248104 used 5848 (taken, jhead 2 (data))
LEB 29 free 253952 dirty 0 used 0 (empty)
LEB 33 free 0 dirty 253952 used 0 (taken)
LEB 34 free 217088 dirty 36544 used 320 (taken, jhead 1 (base))
LEB 37 free 253952 dirty 0 used 0 (empty)
OTHERS: index lebs, zero-available non-index lebs
According to the budget algorithm, there are 5 LEBs reserved for budget:
three journal heads(16,23,34), 1 GC LEB(21) and 1 deletion LEB(can be
used in make_reservation()). There are 2 empty LEBs used for index nodes,
which is calculated as min_idx_lebs - idx_lebs = 2. In theory, LEB 15
and 33 should be reclaimed as free state after committing, but it is now
in taken state. After looking the realization of reserve_space(), there's
a possible situation:
LEB 15: free 2000 dirty 248000 used 3952 (jhead 2)
LEB 23: free 2000 dirty 248104 used 3848 (bud, taken)
LEB 33: free 2000 dirty 251952 used 0 (bud, taken)
wb_workfn wb_workfn_2
do_writepage // write 3000 bytes
ubifs_jnl_write_data
make_reservation
reserve_space
ubifs_garbage_collect
ubifs_find_dirty_leb // ret ENOSPC, dirty LEBs are taken
nospc_retries++ // 1
ubifs_run_commit
do_commit
LEB 15: free 2000 dirty 248000 used 3952 (jhead 2)
LEB 23: free 2000 dirty 248104 used 3848 (dirty)
LEB 33: free 2000 dirty 251952 used 0 (dirty)
do_writepage // write 2000 bytes for 3 times
ubifs_jnl_write_data
// grabs 15\23\33
LEB 15: free 0 dirty 248000 used 5952 (bud, taken)
LEB 23: free 0 dirty 248104 used 5848 (jhead 2)
LEB 33: free 0 dirty 253952 used 0 (bud, taken)
reserve_space
ubifs_garbage_collect
ubifs_find_dirty_leb // ret ENOSPC, dirty LEBs are taken
if (nospc_retries++ < 2) // false
ubifs_ro_mode !
Fetch a reproducer in Link.
The dirty LEBs could be grabbed by other threads, which fails finding dirty
LEBs of GC in current thread, so make_reservation() could try many times to
invoke GC&&committing, but current realization limits the times of retrying
as 'nospc_retries'(twice).
Fix it by adding a wait queue, start queuing up space reservation tasks
when someone task has retried gc + commit for many times. Then there is
only one task making space reservation at any time, and it can always make
success under the premise of correct budgeting.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218164
Fixes: 1e51764a3c2a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ubifs/ubifs.h')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ubifs/ubifs.h | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h index 6eba287ae66c..1f3ea879d93a 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h +++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h @@ -1047,6 +1047,8 @@ struct ubifs_debug_info; * @bg_bud_bytes: number of bud bytes when background commit is initiated * @old_buds: buds to be released after commit ends * @max_bud_cnt: maximum number of buds + * @need_wait_space: Non %0 means space reservation tasks need to wait in queue + * @reserve_space_wq: wait queue to sleep on if @need_wait_space is not %0 * * @commit_sem: synchronizes committer with other processes * @cmt_state: commit state @@ -1305,6 +1307,8 @@ struct ubifs_info { long long bg_bud_bytes; struct list_head old_buds; int max_bud_cnt; + atomic_t need_wait_space; + wait_queue_head_t reserve_space_wq; struct rw_semaphore commit_sem; int cmt_state; |