Merge tag 'v5.0-rc7' into patchwork

Linux 5.0-rc7

* tag 'v5.0-rc7': (1667 commits)
  Linux 5.0-rc7
  Input: elan_i2c - add ACPI ID for touchpad in Lenovo V330-15ISK
  Input: st-keyscan - fix potential zalloc NULL dereference
  Input: apanel - switch to using brightness_set_blocking()
  powerpc/64s: Fix possible corruption on big endian due to pgd/pud_present()
  efi/arm: Revert "Defer persistent reservations until after paging_init()"
  arm64, mm, efi: Account for GICv3 LPI tables in static memblock reserve table
  sunrpc: fix 4 more call sites that were using stack memory with a scatterlist
  include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module
  Compiler Attributes: add support for __copy (gcc >= 9)
  lib/crc32.c: mark crc32_le_base/__crc32c_le_base aliases as __pure
  auxdisplay: ht16k33: fix potential user-after-free on module unload
  x86/platform/UV: Use efi_runtime_lock to serialise BIOS calls
  i2c: bcm2835: Clear current buffer pointers and counts after a transfer
  i2c: cadence: Fix the hold bit setting
  drm: Use array_size() when creating lease
  dm thin: fix bug where bio that overwrites thin block ignores FUA
  Revert "exec: load_script: don't blindly truncate shebang string"
  Revert "gfs2: read journal in large chunks to locate the head"
  net: ethernet: freescale: set FEC ethtool regs version
  ...

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 32 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 581edcc63c26..978d63a8261c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1726,12 +1726,33 @@ void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
 }
 
+/**
+ * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() - Start lock acquisition for another task
+ * @lock:		the rt_mutex to take
+ * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
+ * @task:		the task to prepare
+ *
+ * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
+ * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
+ *
+ * NOTE: does _NOT_ remove the @waiter on failure; must either call
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() or rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock() after this.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *  0 - task blocked on lock
+ *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
+ * <0 - error
+ *
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support.
+ */
 int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 			      struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
 			      struct task_struct *task)
 {
 	int ret;
 
+	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+
 	if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, task, NULL))
 		return 1;
 
@@ -1749,9 +1770,6 @@ int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 		ret = 0;
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(ret))
-		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
-
 	debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(waiter);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1763,12 +1781,18 @@ int __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
  * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
  * @task:		the task to prepare
  *
+ * Starts the rt_mutex acquire; it enqueues the @waiter and does deadlock
+ * detection. It does not wait, see rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() for that.
+ *
+ * NOTE: unlike __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock this _DOES_ remove the @waiter
+ * on failure.
+ *
  * Returns:
  *  0 - task blocked on lock
  *  1 - acquired the lock for task, caller should wake it up
  * <0 - error
  *
- * Special API call for FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI support.
+ * Special API call for PI-futex support.
  */
 int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 			      struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
@@ -1778,6 +1802,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
 	ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(lock, waiter, task);
+	if (unlikely(ret))
+		remove_waiter(lock, waiter);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1845,7 +1871,8 @@ int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
  * @lock:		the rt_mutex we were woken on
  * @waiter:		the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter
  *
- * Attempt to clean up after a failed rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock().
+ * Attempt to clean up after a failed __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() or
+ * rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock().
  *
  * Unless we acquired the lock; we're still enqueued on the wait-list and can
  * in fact still be granted ownership until we're removed. Therefore we can