diff options
| author | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:49:52 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2024-03-12 09:55:57 +0100 |
| commit | 2e2bc42c8381d2c0e9604b59e49264821da29368 (patch) | |
| tree | c158510b5e7942b3a0d6eb6807cbeacf96035798 /lib/memcpy_kunit.c | |
| parent | 428080c9b19bfda37c478cd626dbd3851db1aff9 (diff) | |
| parent | 855684c7d938c2442f07eabc154e7532b4c1fbf9 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict
There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:
38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better
than the original commit:
1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code
... which was also done by an internal merge resolution:
2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree
But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient
within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block.
So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's
tree and follow his conflict resolution.
Conflicts:
arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/memcpy_kunit.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/memcpy_kunit.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c index 440aee705ccc..30e00ef0bf2e 100644 --- a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c +++ b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct some_bytes { BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(instance.data) != 32); \ for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(instance.data); i++) { \ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, instance.data[i], v, \ - "line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %d (saw 0x%02x)\n", \ + "line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %zu (saw 0x%02x)\n", \ __LINE__, #instance, v, i, instance.data[i]); \ } \ } while (0) @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct some_bytes { BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(one) != sizeof(two)); \ for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(one); i++) { \ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, one.data[i], two.data[i], \ - "line %d: %s.data[%d] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%d] (0x%02x)\n", \ + "line %d: %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x)\n", \ __LINE__, #one, i, one.data[i], #two, i, two.data[i]); \ } \ kunit_info(test, "ok: " TEST_OP "() " name "\n"); \ |