diff options
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2023-04-21 08:19:30 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2023-04-21 08:19:30 +0100 |
| commit | e2598dbd21279d355d9c808eb14d336b94e3c788 (patch) | |
| tree | cdbc45676febaf1c04d4e10a8c51dc23dded8f90 /net/sctp/outqueue.c | |
| parent | 2f3a247c3994ece3acb7616965b656622bbf5243 (diff) | |
| parent | dbda0fba7a14f14835c34d59fd329cb90a887862 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'sctp-nested-flex-arrays'
Xin Long says:
====================
sctp: fix a plenty of flexible-array-nested warnings
Paolo noticed a compile warning in SCTP,
../net/sctp/stream_sched_fc.c: note: in included file (through ../include/net/sctp/sctp.h):
../include/net/sctp/structs.h:335:41: warning: array of flexible structures
But not only this, there are actually quite a lot of such warnings in
some SCTP structs. This patchset fixes most of warnings by deleting
these nested flexible array members.
After this patchset, there are still some warnings left:
# make C=2 CF="-Wflexible-array-nested" M=./net/sctp/
./include/net/sctp/structs.h:1145:41: warning: nested flexible array
./include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:641:34: warning: nested flexible array
./include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:643:34: warning: nested flexible array
./include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:644:33: warning: nested flexible array
./include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:650:40: warning: nested flexible array
./include/uapi/linux/sctp.h:653:39: warning: nested flexible array
the 1st is caused by __data[] in struct ip_options, not in SCTP;
the others are in uapi, and we should not touch them.
Note that instead of completely deleting it, we just leave it as a
comment in the struct, signalling to the reader that we do expect
such variable parameters over there, as Marcelo suggested.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sctp/outqueue.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/sctp/outqueue.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c index 20831079fb09..0dc6b8ab9963 100644 --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c @@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ static void sctp_sack_update_unack_data(struct sctp_association *assoc, unack_data = assoc->next_tsn - assoc->ctsn_ack_point - 1; - frags = sack->variable; + frags = (union sctp_sack_variable *)(sack + 1); for (i = 0; i < ntohs(sack->num_gap_ack_blocks); i++) { unack_data -= ((ntohs(frags[i].gab.end) - ntohs(frags[i].gab.start) + 1)); @@ -1252,7 +1252,6 @@ int sctp_outq_sack(struct sctp_outq *q, struct sctp_chunk *chunk) struct sctp_transport *transport; struct sctp_chunk *tchunk = NULL; struct list_head *lchunk, *transport_list, *temp; - union sctp_sack_variable *frags = sack->variable; __u32 sack_ctsn, ctsn, tsn; __u32 highest_tsn, highest_new_tsn; __u32 sack_a_rwnd; @@ -1313,8 +1312,12 @@ int sctp_outq_sack(struct sctp_outq *q, struct sctp_chunk *chunk) /* Get the highest TSN in the sack. */ highest_tsn = sack_ctsn; - if (gap_ack_blocks) + if (gap_ack_blocks) { + union sctp_sack_variable *frags = + (union sctp_sack_variable *)(sack + 1); + highest_tsn += ntohs(frags[gap_ack_blocks - 1].gab.end); + } if (TSN_lt(asoc->highest_sacked, highest_tsn)) asoc->highest_sacked = highest_tsn; @@ -1789,7 +1792,7 @@ static int sctp_acked(struct sctp_sackhdr *sack, __u32 tsn) * Block are assumed to have been received correctly. */ - frags = sack->variable; + frags = (union sctp_sack_variable *)(sack + 1); blocks = ntohs(sack->num_gap_ack_blocks); tsn_offset = tsn - ctsn; for (i = 0; i < blocks; ++i) { |