diff options
| author | Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> | 2024-11-27 21:30:14 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> | 2024-12-03 10:42:29 +0100 |
| commit | 2c7f14ed9c19ec0f149479d1c2842ec1f9bf76d7 (patch) | |
| tree | 104093f0859144aa2b2c8fb882af5b041cf6a95e /net | |
| parent | 0541db8ee32c09463a72d0987382b3a3336b0043 (diff) | |
net/smc: fix LGR and link use-after-free issue
We encountered a LGR/link use-after-free issue, which manifested as
the LGR/link refcnt reaching 0 early and entering the clear process,
making resource access unsafe.
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 107447 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0x140
Workqueue: events smc_lgr_terminate_work [smc]
Call trace:
refcount_warn_saturate+0x9c/0x140
__smc_lgr_terminate.part.45+0x2a8/0x370 [smc]
smc_lgr_terminate_work+0x28/0x30 [smc]
process_one_work+0x1b8/0x420
worker_thread+0x158/0x510
kthread+0x114/0x118
or
refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 93140 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0xf0/0x140
Workqueue: smc_hs_wq smc_listen_work [smc]
Call trace:
refcount_warn_saturate+0xf0/0x140
smcr_link_put+0x1cc/0x1d8 [smc]
smc_conn_free+0x110/0x1b0 [smc]
smc_conn_abort+0x50/0x60 [smc]
smc_listen_find_device+0x75c/0x790 [smc]
smc_listen_work+0x368/0x8a0 [smc]
process_one_work+0x1b8/0x420
worker_thread+0x158/0x510
kthread+0x114/0x118
It is caused by repeated release of LGR/link refcnt. One suspect is that
smc_conn_free() is called repeatedly because some smc_conn_free() from
server listening path are not protected by sock lock.
e.g.
Calls under socklock | smc_listen_work
-------------------------------------------------------
lock_sock(sk) | smc_conn_abort
smc_conn_free | \- smc_conn_free
\- smcr_link_put | \- smcr_link_put (duplicated)
release_sock(sk)
So here add sock lock protection in smc_listen_work() path, making it
exclusive with other connection operations.
Fixes: 3b2dec2603d5 ("net/smc: restructure client and server code in af_smc")
Co-developed-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Co-developed-by: Kai <KaiShen@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai <KaiShen@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/smc/af_smc.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index ed6d4d520bc7..9e6c69d18581 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -1900,6 +1900,7 @@ static void smc_listen_out(struct smc_sock *new_smc) if (tcp_sk(new_smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc) atomic_dec(&lsmc->queued_smc_hs); + release_sock(newsmcsk); /* lock in smc_listen_work() */ if (lsmc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) { lock_sock_nested(&lsmc->sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); smc_accept_enqueue(&lsmc->sk, newsmcsk); @@ -2421,6 +2422,7 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work) u8 accept_version; int rc = 0; + lock_sock(&new_smc->sk); /* release in smc_listen_out() */ if (new_smc->listen_smc->sk.sk_state != SMC_LISTEN) return smc_listen_out_err(new_smc); |