summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>2024-11-04 10:41:13 +0100
committerPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>2024-11-05 22:06:10 +0100
commit9adbb4198bf6cf3634032871118a7052aeaa573f (patch)
tree17eddadb262d009c3ab7490815289678321c3190 /net
parent08e52cccae11a4148a5810f0bd5614796994d221 (diff)
netfilter: nf_tables: avoid false-positive lockdep splat on rule deletion
On rule delete we get: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:3420 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! 1 lock held by iptables/134: #0: ffff888008c4fcc8 (&nft_net->commit_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nf_tables_valid_genid (include/linux/jiffies.h:101) nf_tables Code is fine, no other CPU can change the list because we're holding transaction mutex. Pass the needed lockdep annotation to the iterator and fix two comments for functions that are no longer restricted to rcu-only context. This is enough to resolve rule delete, but there are several other missing annotations, added in followup-patches. Fixes: 28875945ba98 ("rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking") Reported-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org> Tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/da27f17f-3145-47af-ad0f-7fd2a823623e@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
-rw-r--r--net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c23
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 30331688301e..80c285ac7e07 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -3411,13 +3411,15 @@ void nft_expr_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_expr *expr)
* Rules
*/
-static struct nft_rule *__nft_rule_lookup(const struct nft_chain *chain,
+static struct nft_rule *__nft_rule_lookup(const struct net *net,
+ const struct nft_chain *chain,
u64 handle)
{
struct nft_rule *rule;
// FIXME: this sucks
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(rule, &chain->rules, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(rule, &chain->rules, list,
+ lockdep_commit_lock_is_held(net)) {
if (handle == rule->handle)
return rule;
}
@@ -3425,13 +3427,14 @@ static struct nft_rule *__nft_rule_lookup(const struct nft_chain *chain,
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
}
-static struct nft_rule *nft_rule_lookup(const struct nft_chain *chain,
+static struct nft_rule *nft_rule_lookup(const struct net *net,
+ const struct nft_chain *chain,
const struct nlattr *nla)
{
if (nla == NULL)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- return __nft_rule_lookup(chain, be64_to_cpu(nla_get_be64(nla)));
+ return __nft_rule_lookup(net, chain, be64_to_cpu(nla_get_be64(nla)));
}
static const struct nla_policy nft_rule_policy[NFTA_RULE_MAX + 1] = {
@@ -3732,7 +3735,7 @@ static int nf_tables_dump_rules_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
return 0;
}
-/* called with rcu_read_lock held */
+/* Caller must hold rcu read lock or transaction mutex */
static struct sk_buff *
nf_tables_getrule_single(u32 portid, const struct nfnl_info *info,
const struct nlattr * const nla[], bool reset)
@@ -3759,7 +3762,7 @@ nf_tables_getrule_single(u32 portid, const struct nfnl_info *info,
return ERR_CAST(chain);
}
- rule = nft_rule_lookup(chain, nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]);
+ rule = nft_rule_lookup(net, chain, nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]);
if (IS_ERR(rule)) {
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]);
return ERR_CAST(rule);
@@ -4057,7 +4060,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
if (nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]) {
handle = be64_to_cpu(nla_get_be64(nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]));
- rule = __nft_rule_lookup(chain, handle);
+ rule = __nft_rule_lookup(net, chain, handle);
if (IS_ERR(rule)) {
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]);
return PTR_ERR(rule);
@@ -4079,7 +4082,7 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
if (nla[NFTA_RULE_POSITION]) {
pos_handle = be64_to_cpu(nla_get_be64(nla[NFTA_RULE_POSITION]));
- old_rule = __nft_rule_lookup(chain, pos_handle);
+ old_rule = __nft_rule_lookup(net, chain, pos_handle);
if (IS_ERR(old_rule)) {
NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_POSITION]);
return PTR_ERR(old_rule);
@@ -4296,7 +4299,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
if (chain) {
if (nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]) {
- rule = nft_rule_lookup(chain, nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]);
+ rule = nft_rule_lookup(info->net, chain, nla[NFTA_RULE_HANDLE]);
if (IS_ERR(rule)) {
if (PTR_ERR(rule) == -ENOENT &&
NFNL_MSG_TYPE(info->nlh->nlmsg_type) == NFT_MSG_DESTROYRULE)
@@ -8101,7 +8104,7 @@ static int nf_tables_dump_obj_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
return 0;
}
-/* called with rcu_read_lock held */
+/* Caller must hold rcu read lock or transaction mutex */
static struct sk_buff *
nf_tables_getobj_single(u32 portid, const struct nfnl_info *info,
const struct nlattr * const nla[], bool reset)