Merge branch 'linus' into x86/boot, to resolve conflict

There's a new conflict with Linus's upstream tree, because
in the following merge conflict resolution in <asm/coco.h>:

  38b334fc767e Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.9_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Linus has resolved the conflicting placement of 'cc_mask' better
than the original commit:

  1c811d403afd x86/sev: Fix position dependent variable references in startup code

... which was also done by an internal merge resolution:

  2e5fc4786b7a Merge branch 'x86/sev' into x86/boot, to resolve conflicts and to pick up dependent tree

But Linus is right in 38b334fc767e, the 'cc_mask' declaration is sufficient
within the #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CC_PLATFORM block.

So instead of forcing Linus to do the same resolution again, merge in Linus's
tree and follow his conflict resolution.

 Conflicts:
	arch/x86/include/asm/coco.h

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
index 741533f2b075..d67ffa3ec63a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ static int check_results(size_t span)
 
 	fp = fopen(output, "r");
 	if (!fp) {
-		perror(output);
+		ksft_perror(output);
 
-		return errno;
+		return -1;
 	}
 
 	runs = 0;
@@ -86,7 +86,9 @@ static int check_results(size_t span)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int mbm_setup(struct resctrl_val_param *p)
+static int mbm_setup(const struct resctrl_test *test,
+		     const struct user_params *uparams,
+		     struct resctrl_val_param *p)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -95,9 +97,8 @@ static int mbm_setup(struct resctrl_val_param *p)
 		return END_OF_TESTS;
 
 	/* Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run. */
-	if (p->num_of_runs == 0 && validate_resctrl_feature_request("MB", NULL))
-		ret = write_schemata(p->ctrlgrp, "100", p->cpu_no,
-				     p->resctrl_val);
+	if (p->num_of_runs == 0 && resctrl_resource_exists("MB"))
+		ret = write_schemata(p->ctrlgrp, "100", uparams->cpu, test->resource);
 
 	p->num_of_runs++;
 
@@ -109,13 +110,12 @@ void mbm_test_cleanup(void)
 	remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
 }
 
-int mbm_bw_change(int cpu_no, const char * const *benchmark_cmd)
+static int mbm_run_test(const struct resctrl_test *test, const struct user_params *uparams)
 {
 	struct resctrl_val_param param = {
 		.resctrl_val	= MBM_STR,
 		.ctrlgrp	= "c1",
 		.mongrp		= "m1",
-		.cpu_no		= cpu_no,
 		.filename	= RESULT_FILE_NAME,
 		.bw_report	= "reads",
 		.setup		= mbm_setup
@@ -124,14 +124,30 @@ int mbm_bw_change(int cpu_no, const char * const *benchmark_cmd)
 
 	remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
 
-	ret = resctrl_val(benchmark_cmd, &param);
+	ret = resctrl_val(test, uparams, uparams->benchmark_cmd, &param);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
 	ret = check_results(DEFAULT_SPAN);
+	if (ret && (get_vendor() == ARCH_INTEL))
+		ksft_print_msg("Intel MBM may be inaccurate when Sub-NUMA Clustering is enabled. Check BIOS configuration.\n");
 
 out:
 	mbm_test_cleanup();
 
 	return ret;
 }
+
+static bool mbm_feature_check(const struct resctrl_test *test)
+{
+	return resctrl_mon_feature_exists("L3_MON", "mbm_total_bytes") &&
+	       resctrl_mon_feature_exists("L3_MON", "mbm_local_bytes");
+}
+
+struct resctrl_test mbm_test = {
+	.name = "MBM",
+	.resource = "MB",
+	.vendor_specific = ARCH_INTEL,
+	.feature_check = mbm_feature_check,
+	.run_test = mbm_run_test,
+};