diff options
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 |
2 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug index 3cf6132a4bb9..cab5a4bebe9c 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig.debug @@ -114,4 +114,19 @@ config RCU_EQS_DEBUG Say N here if you need ultimate kernel/user switch latencies Say Y if you are unsure +config RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD + bool "Provide debug RCU implementation with short grace periods" + depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && RCU_EXPERT + default n + select PREEMPT_COUNT if PREEMPT=n + help + Select this option to build an RCU variant that is strict about + grace periods, making them as short as it can. This limits + scalability, destroys real-time response, degrades battery + lifetime and kills performance. Don't try this on large + machines, as in systems with more than about 10 or 20 CPUs. + But in conjunction with tools like KASAN, it can be helpful + when looking for certain types of RCU usage bugs, for example, + too-short RCU read-side critical sections. + endmenu # "RCU Debugging" diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h index 982fc5be5269..44cf77db7cae 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ static void __init rcu_bootup_announce_oddness(void) pr_info("\tRCU dyntick-idle grace-period acceleration is enabled.\n"); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_RCU)) pr_info("\tRCU lockdep checking is enabled.\n"); + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD)) + pr_info("\tRCU strict (and thus non-scalable) grace periods enabled.\n"); if (RCU_NUM_LVLS >= 4) pr_info("\tFour(or more)-level hierarchy is enabled.\n"); if (RCU_FANOUT_LEAF != 16) |