| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In order to avoid the DSB keeping the DEwake permanently
asserted we must clear DSB_PMCTRL_2.DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE once
we are done. For good measure do the same for
DSB_PMCTRL.DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE.
Experimentally this doens't seem to be actually necessary
(unlike with DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE). That is, the DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE
doesn't seem to do anything whenever the DSB is not active.
But I'd hate to waste a ton of power in case there I'm wrong
and there is some way DEwake could remaing asserted. One extra
register write is a small price to pay for some peace of mind.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Allow intel_dsb_chain() to start the chained DSB
at start of the undelaye vblank. This is slightly
more involved than simply setting the bit as we
must use the DEwake mechanism to eliminate pkgC
latency.
And DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE itself is problematic in that
it allows us to configure just a single scanline,
and if the current scanline is already past that
DSB_ENABLE_DEWAKE won't do anything, rendering the
whole thing moot.
The current workaround involves checking the pipe's current
scanline with the CPU, and if it looks like we're about to
miss the configured DEwake scanline we set DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE
to immediately assert DEwake. This is somewhat racy since the
hardware is making progress all the while we're checking it on
the CPU.
We can make things less racy by chaining two DSBs and handling
the DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE stuff entirely without CPU involvement:
1. CPU starts the first DSB immediately
2. First DSB configures the second DSB, including its dewake_scanline
3. First DSB starts the second w/ DSB_WAIT_FOR_VBLANK
4. First DSB asserts DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE
5. First DSB waits until we're outside the dewake_scanline-vblank_start
window
6. First DSB deasserts DSB_FORCE_DEWAKE
That will guarantee that the we are fully awake when the second
DSB starts to actually execute.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
In order to handle the DEwake tricks without involving
the CPU we need a mechanism by which one DSB can start
another one. Add a basic function to do so. We'll extend
it later with additional code to actually deal with
DEwake.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Add functions to emit a DSB scanline window wait instructions.
We can either wait for the scanline to be IN the window
or OUT of the window.
The hardware doesn't handle wraparound so we must manually
deal with it by swapping the IN range to the inverse OUT
range, or vice versa.
Also add a bit of paranoia to catch the edge case of waiting
for the entire frame. That doesn't make sense since an IN
wait would be a nop, and an OUT wait would imply waiting
forever. Most of the time this also results in both scanline
ranges (original and inverted) to have lower=upper+1
which is nonsense from the hw POV.
For now we are only handling the case where the scanline wait
happens prior to latching the double buffered registers during
the commit (which might change the timings due to LRR/VRR/etc.)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Adjust the code that determines the correct DSB_CHICKEN value
to be usable for use within DSB commands themselves. Ie.
precompute it based on our knowledge of what the hardware state
(VRR vs. not mainly) will be at the time of the commit.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
When determining various scanlines for DSB use we should take into
account whether VRR is active at the time when the DSB uses said
scanline information. For now all DSB scanline usage occurs prior
to the actual commit, so we only need to care about the state of
VRR at that time.
I've decided to move intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw() in its entirety
to the DSB code as it will also need to know the actual state
of VRR in order to do its job 100% correctly.
TODO: figure out how much of this could be moved to some
more generic place and perhaps be shared with the CPU
vblank evasion code/etc...
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Currently we calculate the DEwake scanline based on
the delayed vblank start, while in reality it should be computed
based on the undelayed vblank start (as that is where the DSB
actually starts). Currently it doesn't really matter as we
don't have any vblank delay configured, but that may change
in the future so let's be accurate in what we do.
We can also remove the max() as intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw()
can deal with negative numbers, which there really shouldn't
be anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Relocate intel_dsb_dewake_scanline() and dsb_chicken() upwards
in the file. I need to reuse these while emitting DSB
commands, and I'd like to keep the DSB command emission
stuff more or less grouped together in the file.
Also drop the intel_ prefix from intel_dsb_dewake_scanline() since
it's all internal stuff and thus doesn't need so much namespacing.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Currently we switch from out software idea of a scanline
to the hw's idea of a scanline during the commit phase in
_intel_dsb_commit(). While that is slightly easier due to
fastsets fiddling with the timings, we'll also need to
generate proper hw scanline numbers already when emitting
DSB scanline wait instructions. So this approach won't
do in the future. Switch to hw scanline numbers earlier.
Also intel_dsb_dewake_scanline() itself already makes
some assumptions about VRR that don't take into account
VRR toggling during fastsets, so technically delaying
the sw->hw conversion doesn't even help us.
The other reason for delaying the conversion was that we
are using intel_get_crtc_scanline() during intel_dsb_commit()
which gives us the current sw scanline. But this is pretty
low level stuff anyway so just using raw PIPEDSL reads seems
fine here, and that of course gives us the hw scanline
directly, reducing the need to do so many conversions.
v2: Return the non-hw scanline from intel_dsb_dewake_scanline()
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624191032.27333-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
|
Enable all DSB error/fault interrupts so that we can see if
anything goes terribly wrong.
v2: Pass intel_display to DISPLAY_VER() (Jani)
Drop extra '/' from drm_err() for consistency
v3: Reorder the irq handler a bit
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240625135852.13431-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
As we extend the use of DSB for critical pipe/plane register
programming, it'll be nice to have an escape valve at hand,
in case things go very poorly. To that end, add a i915.enable_dsb
modparam by which we can force the driver to take the pure mmio
path instead.
v2: Use 0400 permissions for the actual modparam (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240611133344.30673-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
The future direction will be to mainly use intel_display
rather than i915 in the display code. Start on that path
for the DSB code.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240611133344.30673-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
The DSB code will need to examine both the old and new crtc
states. Pass in the whole atomic state so we can dig up
what we need.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240611133344.30673-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Allow the caller of intel_dsb_prepare() to determine which DSB
engine (out of the three possible per pipe) to use. This will
let us utilize multiple DSB engines during the same commit.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240531114101.19994-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
We're going to need to make the DSB ID visible outside the DSB
code, so that we eg. can use multiple DSB engines in parallel.
to that end move the definition to intel_dsb.h.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240531114101.19994-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
Namespace the DSB ID enum properly, and make the naming match
other such enums in general. Also make the names 0 based as
that's what Bspec uses for DSB (unlike eg. planes where it
uses 1 based indexing).
We'll throw out INVALID_DSB while at it since we have no use for
it at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240531114101.19994-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
With the register header refactoring, some of the includes of i915_reg.h
have become unnecessary. Remove.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240530100747.328631-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Replace a few hand rolled copies of intel_mode_vblank_start() with
the real thing.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240528185647.7765-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Bspec asks us to always set the DSB_SKIP_WAITS_EN bit in
DSB_CHICKEN. This seems to instruct DSB to skip vblank and
scanline waits when PSR is entered.
I don't think we have any cases currently where we would want
to enter PSR while DSB is waiting for something, but let's
set the bit anyway to align with Bspec's wishes.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240306040806.21697-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Looks like the undelayed vblank gets signalled exactly when
the active period ends. That is a problem for DSB+VRR when
we are already in vblank and expect DSB to start executing
as soon as we send the push. Instead of starting, the DSB
just keeps on waiting for the undelayed vblank which won't
signal until the end of the next frame's active period,
which is far too late.
The end result is that DSB won't have even started
executing by the time the flips/etc. have completed.
We then wait for an extra 1ms, after which we terminate
the DSB and report a timeout:
[drm] *ERROR* [CRTC:80:pipe A] DSB 0 timed out waiting for idle (current head=0xfedf4000, head=0x0, tail=0x1080)
To fix this let's configure DSB to use the so called VRR
"safe window" instead of the undelayed vblank to trigger
the DSB vblank logic, when VRR is enabled.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 34d8311f4a1c ("drm/i915/dsb: Re-instate DSB for LUT updates")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9927
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240306040806.21697-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
If fixed refresh rate program the PKGC_LATENCY register
with the highest latency from level 1 and above LP registers
and program ADDED_WAKE_TIME = DSB execution time.
else program PKGC_LATENCY with all 1's and ADDED_WAKE_TIME as 0.
This is used to improve package C residency by sending the highest
latency tolerance requirement (LTR) when the planes are done with the
frame until the next frame programming window (set context latency,
window 2) starts.
Bspec: 68986
--v2
-Fix indentation [Chaitanya]
--v3
-Take into account if fixed refrersh rate or not [Vinod]
-Added wake time dependengt on DSB execution time [Vinod]
-Use REG_FIELD_PREP [Jani]
-Call program_pkgc_latency from appropriate place [Jani]
-no need for the ~0 while setting max latency [Jani]
-change commit message to add the new changes made in.
--v4
-Remove extra blank line [Vinod]
-move the vrr.enable check to previous loop [Vinod]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240219063638.1467114-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
|
|
Often getting DSB overflows when starting Xorg or Wayland compositors
when running Xe KMD.
Issue was reported but nothing was done, so disabling DSB as whole
until properly fixed in Xe KMD.
v2:
- move check to HAS_DSB(Jani)
v3:
- use IS_ENABLED(I915) check in intel_dsb_prepare()
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/989
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1031
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/1072
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Francois Dugast <francois.dugast@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240104162411.56085-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
Current, the dewake_scanline variable is defined as unsigned int,
an unsigned int variable that is always greater than or equal to 0.
when _intel_dsb_commit function is called by intel_dsb_commit function,
the dewake_scanline variable may have an int value.
So the dewake_scanline variable is necessary to defined as an int.
Fixes: f83b94d23770 ("drm/i915/dsb: Use DEwake to combat PkgC latency")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310052201.AnVbpgPr-lkp@intel.com/
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: heminhong <heminhong@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231114024341.14524-1-heminhong@kylinos.cn
|
|
Refactor DSB implementation to be compatible with Xe driver.
v1: RFC version.
v2: Make intel_dsb structure opaque from external usage. [Jani]
v3: Rebased on latest.
v4:
- Add boundary check in dsb_buffer_memset(). [Luca]
- Use size_t instead of u32. [Luca]
v5: WARN_ON() added for out of boudary case with some optimization. [Luca]
v6: Rebased on latest and fix a rebase-miss.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231110032518.3564279-1-animesh.manna@intel.com
|
|
The display engine does not snoop the caches so we should mark
the DSB command buffer as I915_CACHE_NONE.
i915_gem_object_create_internal() always gives us I915_CACHE_LLC
on LLC platforms. And to make things 100% correct we should also
clflush at the end, if necessary.
Note that currently this is a non-issue as we always write the
command buffer through a WC mapping, so a cache flush is not actually
needed. But we might actually want to consider a WB mapping since
we also end up reading from the command buffer (in the indexed
reg write handling). Either that or we should do something else
to avoid those reads (might actually be even more sensible on DGFX
since we end up reading over PCIe). But we should measure the overhead
first...
Anyways, no real harm in adding the belts and suspenders here so
that the code will work correctly regardless of how we map the
buffer. If we do get a WC mapping (as we request)
i915_gem_object_flush_map() will be a nop. Well, apart form
a wmb() which may just flush the WC buffer a bit earlier
than would otherwise happen (at the latest the mmio accesses
would trigger the WC flush).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231009132204.15098-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Using system memory for the DSB command buffer doesn't appear to work.
On DG2 it seems like the hardware internally replaces the actual memory
reads with zeroes, and so we end up executing a bunch of NOOPs instead
of whatever commands we put in the buffer. To determine that I measured
the time it takes to execute the instructions, and the results are
always more or less consistent with executing a buffer full of NOOPs
from local memory.
Another theory I considered was some kind of cache coherency issue.
Looks like i915_gem_object_pin_map_unlocked() will in fact give you a
WB mapping for system memory on DGFX regardless of what mapping mode
was requested (WC in case of the DSB code). But clflush did not
change the behaviour at all, so that theory seems moot.
On DG1 it looks like the hardware might actually be fetching data from
system memory as the logs indicate that we just get underruns. But that
is equally bad, so doesn't look like we can really use system memory on
DG1 either.
Thus always allocate the DSB command buffer from local memory on
discrete GPUs.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231009132204.15098-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Normally we could be in a deep PkgC state all the way up to the
point when DSB starts its execution at the transcoders undelayed
vblank. The DSB will then have to wait for the hardware to
wake up before it can execute anything. This will waste a huge
chunk of the vblank time just waiting, and risks the DSB execution
spilling into the vertical active period. That will be very bad,
especially when programming the LUTs as the anti-collision logic
will cause DSB to corrupt LUT writes during vertical active.
To avoid these problems we can instruct the DSB to pre-wake the
display engine on a specific scanline so that everything will
be 100% ready to go when we hit the transcoder's undelayed vblank.
One annoyance is that the scanline is specified as just that,
a single scanline. So if we happen to start the DSB execution
after passing said scanline no DEwake will happen and we may drop
back into some PkgC state before reaching the transcoder's undelayed
vblank. To prevent that we'll use the "force DEwake" bit to manually
force the display engine to stay awake. We'll then have to clear
the force bit again after the DSB is done (the force bit remains
effective even when the DSB is otherwise disabled).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-18-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Writing specific transcoder registers (and as it turns out, the
legacy LUT as well) via DSB needs a magic sequence to emit
non-posted register writes. Add a helper for this.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Add a function for emitting masked register writes.
Note that the mask is implemented through byte enables,
so can only mask off aligned 8bit sets of bits.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Add a helper for emitting a number of DSB NOOPs commands.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Add some defines to specify what goes inside certain DSB
instructions.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
Avoid the locking overhead for DSB registers. We don't need the locks
and intel_dsb_commit() in particular needs to be called from the
vblank evade critical section and thus needs to be fast.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
|
|
The indexed write instruction doesn't support byte-enables, so
if the non-indexed write used those we must not convert it to
an indexed write.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
i915_gem_object_create_internal() does not hand out zeroed
memory. Thus we may confuse whatever stale garbage is in
there as a previous register write and mistakenly handle the
first actual register write as an indexed write. This can
end up corrupting the instruction sufficiently well to lose
the entire register write.
Make sure we've actually emitted a previous instruction before
attemting indexed register write merging.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Dump the full DSB command buffers and head/tail pointers if the
the DSB hasn't completed its job in time.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230606191504.18099-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Clean up i915_reg.h by splitting out DSB regs to
display/intel_dsb_regs.h.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d74b3c564b2d080bf689b3360f1a5e62e47f2e7c.1678973283.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
We'll be wanting to start the DSB from the vblank evasion critical
section so printk()s are a big nono. Get rid of the debug print.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230118163040.29808-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Allow the caller to ask for the DSB commands to execute
during vblank.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230118163040.29808-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Introduce a function to emits whatever commands we need
at the end of the DSB command buffer. For the moment we
only do the tail cacheline alignment there, but eventually
we might want to eg. emit an interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230118163040.29808-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Starting the DSB execution vs. waiting for it stop are two
totally different things. Split intel_dsb_wait() from
intel_dsb_commit() so that we can eventually allow the DSB
to execute asynchronously.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230118163040.29808-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Print the crtc/DSB id information to make it clear which DSB engine
we're talking about.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230118163040.29808-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Add all the know DSB instruction opcodes.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
The caller should more or less know how many DSB commands it
wants to emit into the command buffer, so allow it to specify
the size of the command buffer rather than having the low level
DSB code guess it.
Technically we can emit as many as 134+1033 (for adl+ degamma +
10bit gamma) register writes but thanks to the DSB indexed register
write command we get significant space savings so the current size
estimate of 8KiB (~1024 DSB commands) is sufficient for now.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Move the DSB tail cacheline alignment to a helper. No need to pollute
the caller with mundane details like this.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
The DSB indexed register write insturction is purely an internal
DSB implementation detail, no reason why the caller should have to
know about it. So let's just have the caller emit blind register
writes let the DSB code convert things to an indexed write if/when
multiple writes occur to the same register offset in a row.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Currently intel_dsb_indexed_reg_write() just assumes the previous
instructions is also an indexed register write, and thus only
checks the register offset. Make the check more robust by
actually checking the instruction opcode as well.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Extract a small helper to emit a DSB intstruction. Should
become useful if/when we need to start emitting other
instructions besides register writes.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Pull the DSB command buffer size checks into a small helper so
we don't have repeat the same thing multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
free_pos is in dwords, DSB_BUF_SIZE in bytes. Directly
comparing the two is nonsense. Fix it up, and make sure
we also account for the 8byte alignment requirement for
each instruction, and also assume that each instruction
normally eats two dwords.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
|
Every DSB instruction has to be 8byte aligned. Make sure
that is the case for the non-indexed register writes as well.
The way this could end up unaligned is we emitted an odd
number of indexed register writes beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221216003810.13338-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
|
