| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Recently, I frequently hit the following test failure:
[root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -n 33/1
test_lookup_update:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec
[...]
test_lookup_update:PASS:sync_rcu 0 nsec
test_lookup_update:FAIL:map1_leak inner_map1 leaked!
#33/1 btf_map_in_map/lookup_update:FAIL
#33 btf_map_in_map:FAIL
In the test, after map is closed and then after two rcu grace periods,
it is assumed that map_id is not available to user space.
But the above assumption cannot be guaranteed. After zero or one
or two rcu grace periods in different siturations, the actual
freeing-map-work is put into a workqueue. Later on, when the work
is dequeued, the map will be actually freed.
See bpf_map_put() in kernel/bpf/syscall.c.
By using workqueue, there is no ganrantee that map will be actually
freed after a couple of rcu grace periods. This patch removed
such map leak detection and then the test can pass consistently.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240322061353.632136-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
|
|
Use the new type-safe wrappers around bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd().
Fix a prog/map mixup in prog_holds_map().
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230214231221.249277-6-iii@linux.ibm.com
|
|
If some of the subtests use module BTFs through ksyms, they will cause
bpf_prog to take a refcount on bpf_testmod module, which will prevent it from
successfully unloading. Module's refcnt is decremented when bpf_prog is freed,
which generally happens in RCU callback. So we need to trigger
syncronize_rcu() in the kernel, which can be achieved nicely with
membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED) or membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_GLOBAL) syscall.
So do that in kernel_sync_rcu() and make it available to other test inside the
test_progs. This synchronize_rcu() is called before attempting to unload
bpf_testmod.
Fixes: 9f7fa225894c ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod kernel module for testing")
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210112075520.4103414-5-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
Extend the "diff_size" subtest to also include a non-inlined array map variant
where dynamic inner #elems are possible.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201010234006.7075-5-daniel@iogearbox.net
|
|
This patch tests the inner map size can be different
for reuseport_sockarray but has to be the same for
arraymap. A new subtest "diff_size" is added for this.
The existing test is moved to a subtest "lookup_update".
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200828011819.1970825-1-kafai@fb.com
|
|
Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-side synchronize_rcu()
before checking map existence by their IDs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200729040913.2815687-2-andriin@fb.com
|
|
As discussed at LPC 2019 ([0]), this patch brings (a quite belated) support
for declarative BTF-defined map-in-map support in libbpf. It allows to define
ARRAY_OF_MAPS and HASH_OF_MAPS BPF maps without any user-space initialization
code involved.
Additionally, it allows to initialize outer map's slots with references to
respective inner maps at load time, also completely declaratively.
Despite a weak type system of C, the way BTF-defined map-in-map definition
works, it's actually quite hard to accidentally initialize outer map with
incompatible inner maps. This being C, of course, it's still possible, but
even that would be caught at load time and error returned with helpful debug
log pointing exactly to the slot that failed to be initialized.
As an example, here's a rather advanced HASH_OF_MAPS declaration and
initialization example, filling slots #0 and #4 with two inner maps:
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
struct inner_map {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
__type(key, int);
__type(value, int);
} inner_map1 SEC(".maps"),
inner_map2 SEC(".maps");
struct outer_hash {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH_OF_MAPS);
__uint(max_entries, 5);
__uint(key_size, sizeof(int));
__array(values, struct inner_map);
} outer_hash SEC(".maps") = {
.values = {
[0] = &inner_map2,
[4] = &inner_map1,
},
};
Here's the relevant part of libbpf debug log showing pretty clearly of what's
going on with map-in-map initialization:
libbpf: .maps relo #0: for 6 value 0 rel.r_offset 96 name 260 ('inner_map1')
libbpf: .maps relo #0: map 'outer_arr' slot [0] points to map 'inner_map1'
libbpf: .maps relo #1: for 7 value 32 rel.r_offset 112 name 249 ('inner_map2')
libbpf: .maps relo #1: map 'outer_arr' slot [2] points to map 'inner_map2'
libbpf: .maps relo #2: for 7 value 32 rel.r_offset 144 name 249 ('inner_map2')
libbpf: .maps relo #2: map 'outer_hash' slot [0] points to map 'inner_map2'
libbpf: .maps relo #3: for 6 value 0 rel.r_offset 176 name 260 ('inner_map1')
libbpf: .maps relo #3: map 'outer_hash' slot [4] points to map 'inner_map1'
libbpf: map 'inner_map1': created successfully, fd=4
libbpf: map 'inner_map2': created successfully, fd=5
libbpf: map 'outer_hash': created successfully, fd=7
libbpf: map 'outer_hash': slot [0] set to map 'inner_map2' fd=5
libbpf: map 'outer_hash': slot [4] set to map 'inner_map1' fd=4
Notice from the log above that fd=6 (not logged explicitly) is used for inner
"prototype" map, necessary for creation of outer map. It is destroyed
immediately after outer map is created.
See also included selftest with some extra comments explaining extra details
of usage. Additionally, similar initialization syntax and libbpf functionality
can be used to do initialization of BPF_PROG_ARRAY with references to BPF
sub-programs. This can be done in follow up patches, if there will be a demand
for this.
[0] https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/4/contributions/448/
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200429002739.48006-4-andriin@fb.com
|
