| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[why]
For MST topology with 1 physical link and multiple connectors (>=2),
e.g. daisy cahined MST + SST, or 1-to-multi MST hub, if userspace
set to enable the HDCP simultaneously on all connected outputs, the
commit tail iteratively call the hdcp_update_display() for each
display (connector). However, the hdcp workqueue data structure for
each link has only one DM connector and encryption status members,
which means the work queue of property_validate/update() would only
be triggered for the last connector within this physical link, and
therefore the HDCP property value of other connectors would stay on
DESIRED instead of switching to ENABLED, which is NOT as expected.
[how]
Use array of AMDGPU_DM_MAX_DISPLAY_INDEX for both aconnector and
encryption status in hdcp workqueue data structure for each physical
link. For property validate/update work queue, we iterates over the
array and do similar operation/check for each connected display.
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <Daniel.Wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
connector hdcp properties are lost after display is
unplgged from mst hub. connector is destroyed with
dm_dp_mst_connector_destroy. when display is plugged
back, hdcp is not desired and it wouldnt be enabled.
[How]
save hdcp properties into hdcp_work within
amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail. If the same display is
plugged back with same display index, its hdcp
properties will be retrieved from hdcp_work within
dm_dp_mst_get_modes.
Acked-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
Fixes: 9037246bb2da5 ("drm/amd/display: Add sysfs interface for set/get srm")
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
PSP doesn't have the ability to store SRM in a non-volatile memory. And since
the kernel cannot write to the storage directly, we need usermode to facilitate
this
As per spec the SRM needs to be persistent so this interface is to be
called by the usermode anytime the system goes down/powers on
*boot/resume: load from storage
*shutdown/suspend: save to storage
[How]
Provide a sysfs interface so that the usermode can set/get srm at the right times
save to storage: call "cat /sys/class/drm/card0/device/hdcp_srm > file" after boot and resume
-driver calls psp_get_srm() to get the stored srm and outputs it
load from storage: call "cat file > /sys/class/drm/card0/device/hdcp_srm" before shutdown and suspend
-driver reads the file from sysfs and calls psp_set_srm() to send the SRM to PSP
v2:
-update commit description
-add comment about sysfs file handling in the code
v3:
- squash in use after free fix (Dan Carpenter)
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need this to create sysfs (followup patch)
[How]
Change the parameter
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
Before we had a disable_type1 flag, this forced HDCP 2.2 to type0
There was no way to force type1.
[How]
Remove disable_type1 flag and instead add a flag to force type0/1.
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need to do this to support HDCP over MST
Currently we save a display per link, in a MST case we need to save
multiple displays per link.
[How]
We can create an array per link to cache the displays, but it
complicates the design. Instead we can use the module to cache the
displays.
Now we will always add all the displays to the module, but we use the
adjustment flag to disable hdcp on all of them before they are added.
When we want to enable hdcp we just query the display(cache), remove
it then add it back with different adjustments. Its the similar for
disable.
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
HDCP 2.2 uses type0 and type1 content type. This is passed to the receiver
to stream the proper content.
For example, in a MST case if the main
device is HDCP2.2 capable but the secondary device is only 1.4 capabale
we can use Type0
Type0 content: use HDCP 1.4 or HDCP2.2 type0
Type1 content: Only use HDCP 2.2 type1
[How]
We use the "hdcp content type" property in drm. We use the
disable_type1 flag in hdcp module to select the type based on the
properties.
For updating the property we use the same logic as 1.4, but now we
consider content_type as well and update the property if the
requirements are met
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need to use HW state to set content protection to ENABLED.
This way we know that the link is encrypted from the HW side
[How]
Create a workqueue that queries the HW every ~2seconds, and sets it to
ENABLED or DESIRED based on the result from the hardware
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
|
[Why]
We need to interact with the hdcp module from the DM, the module
has to be interacted with in terms of events
[How]
Create the files needed for linux hdcp. These files manage the events
needed for the dm to interact with the hdcp module.
We use the kernel work queue to process the events needed for
the module
Signed-off-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
|
